Auditing concept categorizations in the UMLS

References 

1. Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB. Building the unified medical language system. In: Kingsland LC, editor. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press; November 1989. p. 475–80.
2. Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB, Schoolman HM, Barnett GO. The unified medical language system: an informatics research collaboration. JAMIA. 1998;5(1):1–11
3. Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The unified medical language system. Methods Inform. Med. 1993;32:281–291
4. US Department of Health and Human Services, NIH, National Library of Medicine. Unified medical language system. 2001.
5. Schuyler PL, Hole WT, Tuttle MS, Sherertz DD. The UMLS metathesaurus: representing different views of biomedical concepts. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 1993;81(2):217–222
   • MEDLINE
6. Tuttle MS, Sherertz DD, Olson NE, Erlbaum MS, Sperzel WD, Fuller LF, et al. Using meta-1 the first version of the UMLS metathesaurus. In: Miller RA, editor. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual SCAMC. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1990. p. 131–5.
7. McCray AT. UMLS semantic network. In: Kingsland LC, editor. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual SCAMC. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1989. p. 503–7
8. McCray AT. Representing biomedical knowledge in the UMLS semantic network. In: Broering NC, editor. High-performance medical libraries: advances in information management for the virtual era. Meckler, Westport, CT; 1993. p. 45–55.
9. McCray AT, Hole WT. The scope and structure of the first version of the UMLS semantic network. In: Miller RA, editor. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual SCAMC. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1990. p. 126–30.
10. Bodenreider O. circular hierarchical relationships in the UMLS: etiology, diagnosis, treatment, complications and prevention. In: Bakken S, editor. Proceedings of the 2001 AMIA Symposium. Washington, DC: Hanley and Belfus, Inc.; 2001. p. 57–61.
11. Bodenreider O. An object-oriented model for representing semantic locality in the UMLS. In: Patel V, Rogers R, Haux R, editors. Proceedings of the Medinfo 2001. IOS Press: Amsterdam; 2001. p. 161–5.
12. Cimino JJ. Auditing the unified medical language system with semantic methods. JAMIA. 1998;5(1):41–51
13. Cimino JJ. Battling scylla and charybdis: the search for redundancy and ambiguity in the 2001 UMLS metathesaurus. In: Bakken S, editor. Proceedings of the 2001 AMIA Symposium. Washington, DC: Hanley and Belfus, Inc; 2001. p. 120–4.
14. Gu H, Perl Y, Geller J, Halper M, Liu L, Cimino JJ. Representing the UMLS as an OODB: modeling issues and advantages. JAMIA 2000;7(1):66–80. Selected for reprint in Haux R, Kulikowski C, editors. Yearbook of medical informatics. Rotterdam: International Medical Informatics Association; 2001. p. 271–85.
15. Hole WT, Srinivasin S. Discoving missed synonymy in a large concept-oriented Metathesaurus. JAMIA. 2000;7:354–358
16. Peng Y, Halper M, Perl Y, Geller J. Auditing the UMLS for redundant classifications. In: Kohane IS, editor. Proceedings of the 2002 AMIA Annual Symposium. San Antonio, TX: Hanley and Belfus, Inc.; November 2002. p. 612–6.
17. Chen Z, Perl Y, Halper M, Geller J, Gu H. Partitioning the UMLS semantic network. IEEE Trans. Inform. Technol. Biomed. 2002;6(2):102–108
18. Perl Y, Chen Z, Halper M, Geller J, Zhang L, Peng Y. The cohesive metaschema: a higher-level abstraction of the UMLS semantic network. J. Biomed. Inform. 2003;35(3):194–212
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
19. Goldstein L, Schneider D, Siegel M. Finite mathematics and its applications. Prentice-Hall; 2003.
20. McCray AT, Burgun A, Bodenreider O. Aggregating UMLS semantic types for reducing conceptual complexity. In: Patel V, Rogers R, Haux R, editors. Proceedings of the Medinfo 2001. London, UK. Amsterdam: IOS Press; September 2001. p. 171–5.
21. Bodenreider O, McCray AT. Exploring semantic groups through visual approaches. J Biomed Inform 2003.