Mining of relations between proteins over biomedical scientific literature using a deep-linguistic approach

References 

1. Rinaldi F, Schneider G, Kaljurand K, Hess M, Andronis C, Persidis A, et al. Relation mining over a corpus of scientific literature. In: Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, LNAI 3581. Aberdeen, Scotland: Springer Verlag; 2005;p. 550–559
2. Rinaldi F, Schneider G, Kaljurand K, Hess M, Romacker M. An environment for relation mining over richly annotated corpora: the case of GENIA. In: Proceedings of the second international symposium on semantic mining in biomedicine. 2006;p. 68–75
3. Daraselia N, Egorov S, Yazhuk A, Novichkova S, Yuryev A, Mazo I. Extracting human protein interactions from MEDLINE using a full-sentence parser. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(5):604–611
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
4. Schibler U. The daily rhythms of genes, cells and organs. Biological clocks and circadian timing in cells. EMBO Rep. 2005;6:9–13
5. Barak S, Tobin E, Andronis C, Sugano S, Green R. All in good time: the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5(12):517–522
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
6. Kim J, Ohta T, Tateisi Y, Tsujii J. GENIA corpus—a semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(1):180–182
7. Kaljurand K, Rinaldi F, Schneider G. Prolog-based query interface to syntactic dependencies extracted from biomedical literature. Technical report IFI-2006.04. University of Zurich; 2006.
8. Rinaldi F, Dowdall J, Hess M, Ellman M, Zarri GP, Persidis A, et al. Multilayer Annotations in PARMENIDES. In:  Handschuh S,  Koivunen M,  Dieng R,  Staab S editor. Proceedings of the K-CAP2003 workshop on knowledge markup and semantic annotation. 2003;p. 33–40
9. Reynar JC, Ratnaparkhi A. A maximum entropy approach to identifying sentence boundaries. In: Proceedings of the fifth conference on applied natural language processing. Washington, DC: University of Pennsylvania; 1997;p. 16–19
10. Marcus M, Santorini B, Marcinkiewicz M. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn treebank. Comput Linguist. 1993;19:313–330
11. Ratnaparkhi A. A maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. In:  Brill E,  Church K editor. Proceedings of the empirical methods in natural language processing conference. University of Pennsylvania; 1996;p. 133–142
12. Minnen G, Carroll J, Pearce D. Applied morphological processing of English. Nat Lang Eng. 2001;7(3):207–223
13. Mikheev A. Automatic rule induction for unknown word guessing. Comput Linguist. 1997;23(3):405–423
14. Schneider G. Extracting and using trace-free functional dependencies from the Penn treebank to reduce parsing complexity. In:  Nivre J,  Hinrichs E editor. Proceedings of the second workshop on treebanks and linguistic theories (TLT 2003), vol. 9 of Mathematical Modelling in Physics, Engineering and Cognitive Science. 2003;p. 153–164
15. Schneider G, Rinaldi F, Dowdall J. Fast, deep-linguistic statistical minimalist dependency parsing. In:  Kruijff G,  Duchier D editor. Proceedings of the COLING-2004 workshop on recent advances in dependency grammars. 2004;p. 33–40
16. M. Collins, Head-statistical models for natural language processing. PhD Thesis. Philadelphia, USA: University of Pennsylvania; 1999.
17. Younger DH. Recognition and parsing of context-free languages in time . Inform Contr. 1967;10:189–208
18. http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/aig/lll/lll05/(accessed: May 10, 2006) In:  Cussens J,  Nédellec C editor. Proceedings of the workshop on learning language in logic (LLL05). 2005;
19. Carroll J, Minnen G, Briscoe E. Parser evaluation: using a grammatical relation annotation scheme. In:  Abeillé A editors. Treebanks: building and using parsed corpora. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2003;p. 299–316
20. Lin D. Dependency-based evaluation of MINIPAR. In: Proceedings of the workshop on the evaluation of parsing systems. 1998;
21. Preiss J. Using grammatical relations to compare parsers. In: Proceedings of the EACL ’03. 2003;p. 291–296
22. Yakushiji A, Tateisi Y, Miyao Y. Event extraction from biomedical papers using a full parser. In: Proceedings of Pacific symposium on biocomputing. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing; 2001;p. 408–419
23. Miyao Y, Ninomiya T, Tsujii J. Corpus-oriented grammar development for acquiring a head-driven phrase structure grammar from the Penn treebank. In: Proceedings of IJCNLP-04. 2004;p. 684–693
24. Friedman C, Kra P, Yu H, Krauthammer M, Rzhetsky A. GENIES: a natural-language processing system for the extraction of molecular pathways from journal articles. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(1):74–82
25. Gaizauskas R, Demetriou G, Artymiuk PJ, Protein Structures WP. Information extraction from biological texts: the PASTA system. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:135–143
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
26. Novichkova S, Egorov S, Daraselia N. MedScan, a natural language processing engine for MEDLINE abstracts. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(13):1699–1706
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
27. Katrenko S, Roos MS, Adriaans M. Learning biological interactions from medline abstracts. In:  Cussens J,  Nédellec C editor. Proceedings of the workshop on learning language in logic (LLL05). 2005;p. 53–58
28. Greenwood MA, Stevenson M, Guo Y, Harkema H, Roberts A. Automatically acquiring a linguistically motivated genic interaction extraction system. In:  Cussens J,  Nédellec C editor. Proceedings of the workshop on learning language in logic (LLL05). 2005;p. 46–52