Using semantic dependencies for consistency management of an ontology of brain–cortex anatomy

References 

1. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The semantic web. Sci Am. 2001;284(5):34–43
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
2. Brinkley J, Wong B, Hinshaw K, Rosse C. Design of an anatomy information system. IEEE Comput Graphics. 1999;19(3):38–48
3. Noy NF, Musen MA, Mejino JLV, Rosse C. Pushing the envelope: challenges in a frame-based representation of human anatomy. Data Knowledge Eng J. 2004;48(3):335–359
4. Rosse C, Mejino JL, Modayur R, Jakobovits BR, Hinshaw KP, Brinkley JF. Motivation and organizational principles for anatomical knowledge representation: the digital anatomist symbolic knowledge base. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(1):17–40
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Rector AL, et al. The GALEN project. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 1994;45:75–78
6. Ono M, Kubik S, Abernathey C. Atlas of the cerebral sulci. Stuttgart: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; 1990;
7. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotactic atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; 1988;
8. Bowden DM, Martin RF. Neuronames brain hierarchy. Neuroimage. 1995;2:63–83
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
9. Dameron O, Gibaud B, Burgun A, Morandi X. Towards a sharable numeric and symbolic knowledge base on cerebral cortex anatomy: lessons from a prototype. In: American Medical Informatics Association AMIA02 proceedings. Hanley and Belfus; 2002;p. 185–189
10. Dameron O, Burgun A, Morandi X, Gibaud B. Modelling dependencies between relations to insure consistency of a cerebral cortex anatomy knowledge base. In: MIE’03 Proceedings. 2003;p. 403–408
11. Artale A, Franconi E, Guarino N, Pazzi L. Part–whole relations in object-centered systems: an overview. Data Knowledge Eng. 1996;20(3):347–383
12. Varzi A. Parts, wholes, and part–whole relations: the prospects of mereotopology. Data Knowledge Eng. 1996;20:259–286
13. Baclawski K, Kokar M, Waldinger R, Kogut P. Consistency checking of semantic web ontologies. In:  Horrocks I,  Hendler J editor. International semantic web conference ISWC02 proceedings. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2002;p. 454–459[vol. 2342 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science]
14. Buchheit M, Donini F, Schaerf A. Decidable reasoning in terminological knowledge representation systems. Technical Report RR-93–10. Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH Erwin-Schrödinger Strasse Postfach 2080 D67608 Kaiserslautern, Germany; 1993.
15. Rector AL, Bechhofer SK, Goble CA, Horrocks I, Nowlan WA, Solomon WD. The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology. Artif Intell Med. 1997;9:139–171
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (2367 KB)
    • CrossRef
16. Schulz S, Hahn U, Romacker M. Modeling anatomical spatial relations with description logics. In: AMIA 2000 annual symposium. Hanley and Belfus; 2000;p. 779–783
17. Schulz S, Hahn U. Mereotopological reasoning about parts and (w)holes in bio-ontology. In:  Welty C,  Smith B editor. Formal ontology in information systems FOIS01. 2001;p. 210–221
18. Golbreich C, Dameron O, Gibaud B, Burgun A. Web ontology language requirements w.r.t expressiveness of taxononomy and axioms in medecine. In: International semantic web conference ISWC03 proceedings. Springer; 2003;[vol. 2870 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science]
19. Noy NF, Musen MA. The prompt suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. J Hum Comput Stud. 2003;59(6):983–1024