Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 3 , Pages 247-259, March 2008

A decision support system to facilitate management of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding

  • Adrienne Chu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States
    • These authors contributed equally to this study.
  • ,
  • Hongshik Ahn

      Affiliations

    • Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States
    • These authors contributed equally to this study.
  • ,
  • Bhawna Halwan

      Affiliations

    • SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, NY 11203, United States
    • These authors contributed equally to this study.
  • ,
  • Bruce Kalmin

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gastroenterology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States
  • ,
  • Everson L.A. Artifon

      Affiliations

    • University of Sao Pualo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Alan Barkun

      Affiliations

    • Mc Gill University, Montreal, Canada H3A 2T5
  • ,
  • Michail G. Lagoudakis

      Affiliations

    • Intelligent Systems Laboratory, Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Kounoupidiana, 73100 Chania Hellas, Greece
  • ,
  • Atul Kumar

      Affiliations

    • United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 631 880 8510; fax: +1 631 486 6113.

Received 19 January 2007; received in revised form 25 September 2007; accepted 6 October 2007.

Summary 

Objective

To develop a model to predict the bleeding source and identify the cohort amongst patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) who require urgent intervention, including endoscopy. Patients with acute GIB, an unpredictable event, are most commonly evaluated and managed by non-gastroenterologists. Rapid and consistently reliable risk stratification of patients with acute GIB for urgent endoscopy may potentially improve outcomes amongst such patients by targeting scarce healthcare resources to those who need it the most.

Design and methods

Using ICD-9 codes for acute GIB, 189 patients with acute GIB and all available data variables required to develop and test models were identified from a hospital medical records database. Data on 122 patients was utilized for development of the model and on 67 patients utilized to perform comparative analysis of the models. Clinical data such as presenting signs and symptoms, demographic data, presence of co-morbidities, laboratory data and corresponding endoscopic diagnosis and outcomes were collected. Clinical data and endoscopic diagnosis collected for each patient was utilized to retrospectively ascertain optimal management for each patient. Clinical presentations and corresponding treatment was utilized as training examples. Eight mathematical models including artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), shrunken centroid (SC), random forest (RF), logistic regression, and boosting were trained and tested. The performance of these models was compared using standard statistical analysis and ROC curves.

Results

Overall the random forest model best predicted the source, need for resuscitation, and disposition with accuracies of approximately 80% or higher (accuracy for endoscopy was greater than 75%). The area under ROC curve for RF was greater than 0.85, indicating excellent performance by the random forest model.

Conclusion

While most mathematical models are effective as a decision support system for evaluation and management of patients with acute GIB, in our testing, the RF model consistently demonstrated the best performance. Amongst patients presenting with acute GIB, mathematical models may facilitate the identification of the source of GIB, need for intervention and allow optimization of care and healthcare resource allocation; these however require further validation.

Keywords: Class prediction, Cross validation, Gastrointestinal bleeding, Machine learning

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0933-3657(07)00131-5

doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2007.10.003

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 3 , Pages 247-259, March 2008