An integrated scheme for feature selection and parameter setting in the support vector machine modeling and its application to the prediction of pharmacokinetic properties of drugs

References 

1. Wichmann K, Diedenhofen M, Klamt A. Prediction of blood–brain partitioning and human serum albumin binding based on COSMO-RS σ-moments. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2007;47:228–233
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
2. Davis AM, Riley RJ. Predictive ADMET studies, the challenges and the opportunities. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2004;8:378–386
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
3. Waterbeemd HVD, Gifford E. ADMET in silico modeling: towards prediction paradise?. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2003;2:192–204
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
4. Garg P, Verma J. In silico Prediction of blood brain barrier permeability: an artificial neural network model. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2006;46:289–297
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Smith PA, Sorich MJ, Low LSC, McKinnon RA, Miners JO. Towards integrated ADME prediction: past, present and future directions for modelling metabolism by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling. 2004;22:507–517
6. Vapnik V. Statistical learning theory. New York, USA: Wiley Press; 1998;p. 1–55
7. Burges CJC. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 1998;2:127–167
8. Burbidge R, Trotter M, Buxton B, Holden S. Drug design by machine learning: support vector machines for pharmaceutical data analysis. Computational Chemistry. 2001;26(1):5–14
9. Trotter M, Holden S. Support vector machines for ADME property classification. QSAR & Combinatorial Science. 2003;22:533–548
10. Fröhlich H, Wegner J, Sieker F, Zell A. Kernel functions for attributed molecular graphs—a new similarity based approach to ADME prediction in classification and regression. QSAR & Combinatorial Science. 2006;25(4):317–326
11. Li H, Yap CW, Xue Y, Li ZR, Ung CY, Han LY, et al. Statistical learning approach for predicting specific pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, or toxicological properties of pharmaceutical agents. Drug Development Research. 2006;66:245–259
12. Huang CL, Wang CJ. A GA-based feature selection and parameters optimization for support vector machines. Expert Systems with Applications. 2006;31:231–240
13. Fröhlich H, Chapelle O, Schölkopf B. Feature selection for support vector machines by means of genetic algorithms. In:  Werner B editors. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence. Sacramento, CA, USA: IEEE Press; 2003;p. 142–148
14. Lucasius CB, Kateman G. Understanding and using genetic algorithms. Part 1. Concepts, properties and context. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 1993;19:1–33
15. Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S, Vapnik V. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Machine Learning. 2002;46:389–422
16. Sutter JM, Kalivas JH. Comparison of forward selection, backward elimination, and generalized simulated annealing for variable selection. Microchemical Journal. 1993;47:60–66
17. Hsu CW, Chang CC, Lin CJ. A practical guide to support vector classification. Available at: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/∼cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf; 2007 [accessed: 01.11.07].
18. Keerthi S, Sindhwani V, Chapelle O. An efficient method for gradient-based adaptation of hyperparameters in SVM models. In:  Schölkopf B,  Platt J,  Hofmann T editor. Advances in neural information processing systems. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press; 2007;p. 673–680
19. Hestenes MR, Stiefel E. Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. 1952;49:409–436
20. Atkinson KA. An introduction to numerical analysis, sections 8, 9. 2nd ed.. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons; 1988;p. 1–76
21. Davis L. Handbook of genetic algorithms. New York, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1991;p. 10–80
22. Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. Available at: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/∼cjlin/libsvm; 2007 [accessed: 01.11.07].
23. (a)Tetko IV, Gasteiger J, Todeschini R, Mauri A, Livingstone D, et al. Virtual computational chemistry laboratory—design and description. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 2005;19:453–463(b)VCCLAB, Virtual Computational Chemistry Laboratory, http://www.vcclab.org; 2007 [accessed: 01.11.07].
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
24. Penzotti JE, Lamb ML, Evensen E, Grootenhuis PDJ. A computational ensemble pharmacophore model for identifying substrates of P-glycoprotein. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2002;45:1737–1740
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
25. Seelig A. A general pattern for substrate recognition by P-glycoprotein. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1998;251:252–261
26. Klopman G, Stefan LR, Saiakhov RD. ADMET evaluation. 2. A computer model for the prediction of intestinal absorption in humans. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2002;17:253–263
27. Abraham MH, Zhao YH, Le J, Hersey A, Luscombe CN, Reynolds DP, et al. On the mechanism of human intestinal absorption. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2002;37:595–605
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
28. De Ponti F, Poluzzi E, Cavalli A, Recanatini M, Montanaro N. Safety of nonantiarrhythmic drugs that prolong the QT interval or induce torsade de pointes: an overview. Drug Safety. 2002;25:263–286
29. Saunders WB. Dorland's illustrated medical dictionary. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Saunders Elsevier; 2007;p. 170–181
30. Xue Y, Li ZR, Yap CW, Sun LZ, Chen X, Chen YZ. Effect of molecular descriptor feature selection in support vector machine classification of pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of chemical agents. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science. 2004;44:1630–1638
    • MEDLINE
31. Norinder U, Haeberlein M. Computational approaches to the prediction of the blood–brain distribution. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2002;54(3):291–313
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
32. Crivori P, Cruciani G, Carrupt PA, Testa B. Predicting blood–brain barrier permeation from three-dimensional molecular structure. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2000;43(11):2204–2216
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
33. Li H, Yap CW, Ung CY, Xue Y, Cao ZW, Chen YZ. Effect of selection of molecular descriptors on the prediction of blood–brain barrier penetrating and nonpenetrating agents by statistical learning methods. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2005;45:1376–1384
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
34. Zhao YH, Abraham MH, Ibrahim A, Fish PV, Cole S, Lewis ML, et al. Predicting penetration across the blood–brain barrier from simple descriptors and fragmentation schemes. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2007;47:170–175
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
35. Iyer M, Mishra R, Han Y, Hopfinger AJ. Predicting blood–brain barrier partitioning of organic molecules using membrane-interaction QSAR analysis. Pharmaceutical Research. 2002;19(11):1611–1621
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
36. Luco JM, Marchevsky E. QSAR studies on blood–brain barrier permeation. Current Computer-Aided Drug Design. 2006;2(1):31–55
37. Trotter MWB, Buxton BF, Holden SB. Support vector machines in combinatorial chemistry. Measurement and Control. 2001;34(8):235–239
38. Doniger S, Hofman T, Yeh J. Predicting CNS permeability of drug molecules: comparison of neural network and support vector machine algorithms. Journal of Computational Biology. 2002;9(6):849–864