Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Volume 45, Issue 2 , Pages 163-171, February 2009

Evaluating switching neural networks through artificial and real gene expression data

  • Marco Muselli

      Affiliations

    • Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell’Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, via De Marini 6, 16149 Genova, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 010 6475213; fax: +39 010 6475200.
  • ,
  • Massimiliano Costacurta

      Affiliations

    • Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell’Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, via De Marini 6, 16149 Genova, Italy
  • ,
  • Francesca Ruffino

      Affiliations

    • Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Informazione, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Comelico 39 , 20135 Milano, Italy

Received 31 October 2007; received in revised form 1 August 2008; accepted 4 August 2008.

Summary 

Objective

DNA microarrays offer the possibility of analyzing the expression level for thousands of genes concerning a specific tissue. An important target of this analysis is to derive the subset of genes involved in a biological process of interest. Here, a new promising method for gene selection is proposed, which presents a good level of accuracy and reliability.

Methods and materials

The proposed technique adopts switching neural networks (SNN), a particular kind of connectionist models, to assign a relevance value to each gene, thus employing recursive feature addition (RFA) to derive the final list of relevant genes. To fairly evaluate the quality of the new approach, called SNN-RFA, its application on three real and three artificial gene expression datasets, generated according to a proper mathematical model that possesses biological and statistical plausibility, has been considered. In particular, a comparison with other two widely used gene selection methods, namely the signal to noise ratio (S2N) and support vector machines with recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), has been performed.

Results

In all the considered cases SNN-RFA achieves the best performances, arriving to determine the whole collection of relevant genes in one of the three artificial datasets. The S2N method exhibits a quality similar to that of SNN-RFA, whereas SVM-RFE shows the worst behavior.

Conclusion

The quality of the proposed method SNN-RFA has been established together with the usefulness of the mathematical model adopted to generate the artificial datasets of gene expression levels.

PACS: 87.17.d, 87.80.y

Keywords: Gene selection, Machine learning, Switching neural networks, Recursive feature addition, Shadow clustering

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0933-3657(08)00104-8

doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2008.08.002

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Volume 45, Issue 2 , Pages 163-171, February 2009