Exploiting the systematic review protocol for classification of medical abstracts

References 

1. Cohen AM, Hersh WR, Peterson K, Yen PY. Reducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classification. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2006;13:206–219
2. Aphinyanaphongs Y, Aliferis C. Text categorization models for retrieval of high quality articles. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2005;12:207–216
3. Haynes RB, Wilczynski N, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ, Sinclair JC. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 1994;1:447–458
4. Kohavi R, Provost F. Glossary of terms. Machine Learning. 1998;30:271–274
5. Witten IH, Frank E. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco; 2005. www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/machine learning/weka/ [accessed 24.09.08].
6. Ma Y. Text classification on imbalanced data: application to systematic reviews automation, M.Sc. thesis, University of Ottawa; 2007.
7. Quinlan JR. Induction on decision trees. Machine Learning. 1986;1:81–106
8. Yang Y, Pedersen J. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In: ICML ‘97: proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco. 1997;p. 412–420
9. Forman G. Choose your words carefully: an empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. In: Proceedings of the 6th European conference on principals of data mining and knowledge discovery. London, England: Springer-Verlag; 2002;p. 150–162
10. National Library of Medicine, Unified medical language system fact sheet. Available at www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/umls.html [accessed 24.09.08].
11. National Library of Medicine. MetaMap. Available at: http://mmtx.nlm.nih.gov [accessed 24.09.08].
12. Cohen AM, Hersh WR, Bhupatiraju RT. Feature generation, feature selection, classifiers, and conceptual drift for biomedical document triage. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth text retrieval conference. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2004;
13. Frank E, Bouckaert RR. Naive Bayes for text classification with unbalanced classes. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on principles and practice of knowledge discovery in databases. Berlin: Springer; 2006;p. 503–510
14. Colas F, Brazdil P. Comparison of SVM and some older classification algorithms. Text classification tasks: artificial intelligence in theory and practice. 217. Boston: Springer; 2006;p. 169–78
15. Dietterich T. Machine-learning research: four current directions. Artificial Intelligence. 1997;18:97–136
16. Kouznetsov A, Matwin S, Inkpen D, Razavi A, Frunza O, Sehatkar M, et al. Classifying biomedical abstracts using committees of classifiers and collective ranking techniques. In: The 22nd Canadian conference on artificial intelligence. Berlin: Springer; 2009;p. 224–228